Phil Currie seemed to have proved his case. But he hadn't.Although he was convinced, his fellow paleontologists still weren't sure.If we just found one site with large predatory dinosaurs,found as a group with multiple individuals of different age sizes was buried together, that could be a fluke, could be a chance.The evidence right now is a little bit equivocal. It's not definite. It's a little circumstantial.Despite all his efforts, Currie's case was not yet proven.He now needed a second site to convince his colleagues that the first dig wasn't a fluke,that large meat-eating dinosaurs really were pack hunters.And then he got some unexpected news.Patagonia, the land which had harbored the bones of Argentinosaurus and Giganotosaurus, had yielded one further treasure.Phil Currie's colleague, Rodolfo Coria, had made a new discovery.We came here by first time because a local farmer called us because of some fossils that he had found.And we were very lucky, because looking in the slope of this hill, we found this bone.
Philip Currie似乎已经证明了他的理论。不，还没有虽然他自己深信不疑，他的同僚对此却不敢确信如果只是找到一个地方，有许多大型掠食恐龙找到一群大大小小的恐龙被埋在一起，这可能只是侥幸，或者说是巧合当前的证据仍然有些令人怀疑。它不是很明确的证据，可能只是偶然情况虽然Currie付出了很多努力，他的观点仍然没有得到证实他现在需要找到第二个地点，使他的同僚们相信第一个挖掘点并非偶然以及大型食肉恐龙真的是集体狩猎者后来，他得到了一个意外的消息巴塔哥尼亚不仅埋藏着阿根廷龙和南方巨兽龙的骨骼化石，还将展示更惊人的秘密Philip Currie的同事Rodolfo Coria有了一项新的发现我们到这里是因为一位当地农民给我们打了电话说他找到了一些化石我们很幸运，因为当我们在这个山坡上搜索时，我们找到了这块骨骼
