Currie's site seemed to prove it all. But other paleontologists were not yet convinced.Bone beds are very tantalizing, because you have a tremendous number of bones in one single layer.And for tempting to look at that as evidence for a herd of animals, living in one place at one time.There are times when the bone bed information I think supports that interpretation. But there are times when it does not.Before anyone would accept Currie's evidence, he would have to verify some key details about the dig site.A collection of bones and bone bed doesn't automatically mean what we looking that a collection of animals lived together.Sometimes bone beds accumulate from large areas of land where floods have brought all kinds of animal remains together and makes them up.So you might be looking at an accumulation from ...of many different animals, from miles and miles away.This was the first problem.Flood waters spreading acrooss the plains could have washed together the remains of several unrelated tyrannosaurs.Buried in the same place millions of years ago, today they might look like a pack.
