Schumpeter: Rules for fools. The terrible threat of unlicensed interior designers. IN 1941 Franklin Roosevelt added two new items to America's ancestral freedoms of speech and worship: freedom from fear and freedom from want. Today's politicians offer a far more generous menu: freedom from unlicensed hair cutters, freedom from cowboy flower arrangers and, most important of all, freedom from rogue interior designers. What is the point of enjoying freedom from fear or want, after all, if you can not enjoy freedom from poorly co ordinated colour schemes? In the 1950s, when organisation man ruled, fewer than 5% of American workers needed licences. Today, after three decades of deregulation, the figure is almost 30%. Add to that people who are preparing to obtain a licence or whose jobs involve some form of certification and the share is 38%. Other rich countries impose far fewer fetters than the land of the free. In Britain only 13% of workers need licences( though that has doubled in 12 years). Some occupations clearly need to be licensed. Nobody wants to unleash amateur doctors and dentists on the public, or untrained tattoo artists for that matter. But, as the Wall Street Journal has doggedly pointed out's, America Licence Raj has extended its tentacles into occupations that pose no plausible threat to health or safety occupations,
