首页在线考试章节闯关谁正在考试学习应用
您的位置:在线考试首页>章节闯关>英语六级>阅读理解>历年真题> 第17关
  • 00:00:00
已做0项(正确0项,错误做0项)/共10项,剩余10项未作答
结束作答
阅读理解
收藏纠错
In the beginning of the movie I, Robot, a robot has to decide whom to save after two cars plunge into the water—Del Spooner or a child. Even though Spooner screams "Save her! Save her!" the robot rescues him because it calculates that he has a 45 percent chance of survival compared to Sarah's 11 percent. The robot's decision and its calculated approach raise an important question: would humans make the same choice? And which choice would we want our robotic counterparts to make?
Isaac Asimov evaded the whole notion of morality in devising his three laws of robotics, which hold that 1. Robots cannot harm humans or allow humans to come to harm; 2. Robots must obey humans, except where the order would conflict with law 1; and 3. Robots must act in self-preservation, unless doing so conflicts with laws 1 or 2. These laws are programmed into Asimov's robots—they don't have to think, judge, or value. They don't have to like humans or believe that hurting them is wrong or bad. They simply don't do it.
The robot who rescues Spooner's life in I, Robot follows Asimov's zeroth law: robots cannot harm humanity (as opposed to individual humans) or allow humanity to come to harm—an expansion of the first law that allows robots to determine what's in the greater good. Under the first law, a robot could not harm a dangerous gunman, but under the zeroth law, a robot could kill the gunman to save others.
Whether it's possible to program a robot with safeguards such as Asimov's laws is debatable. A word such as "harm" is vague (what about emotional harm? Is replacing a human employee harm?), and abstract concepts present coding problems. The robots in Asimov's fiction expose complications and loopholes in the three laws, and even when the laws work, robots still have to assess situations.
Assessing situations can be complicated. A robot has to identify the players, conditions, and possible outcomes for various scenarios. It's doubtful that a computer program can do that—at least, not without some undesirable results. A roboticist at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory programmed a robot to save human proxies (替身) called "H-bots" from danger. When one H-bot headed for danger, the robot successfully pushed it out of the way. But when two H-bots became imperiled, the robot choked 42 percent of the time, unable to decide which to save and letting them both "die." The experiment highlights the importance of morality: without it, how can a robot decide whom to save or what's best for humanity, especially if it can't calculate survival odds?
1
What question does the example in the movie raise?
A.Whether robots can reach better decisions.
B.Whether robots follow Asimov's zeroth law.
C.How robots may make bad judgments.
D.How robots should be programmed.
本题答案:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • 参考答案:D
  • 系统解析:
    由题干中的question和the example in the movie定位到文章首段最后两句。事实细节题。定位句指出,上述的电影场景提出了机器人的决策和计算这一重要问题,并在随后的第二段中介绍了艾萨克·阿西莫夫设计其机器人编程的三条法则。可见,作者描述电影场景所提出的问题与如何设置机器人的程序有关,故答案为D。
2
What does the author think of Asimov's three laws of robotics?
A.They are apparently divorced from reality.
B.They did not follow the coding system of robotics.
C.They laid a solid foundation for robotics.
D.They did not take moral issues into consideration.
本题答案:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • 参考答案:D
  • 系统解析:
    由题干中的the author think of 和Asimov's three laws of robotics定位到文章第二段第一句。观点态度题。定位句指出在作者看来,阿西莫夫在设计其机器人的三条法则时规避了所有道德理念,作者在最后一段也提到为机器人编程时考虑到道德问题是十分重要的,故答案为D。
3
What does the author say about Asimov's robots?
A.They know what is good or bad for human beings.
B.They are programmed not to hurt human beings.
C.They perform duties in their owners' best interest.
D.They stop working when a moral issue is involved.
本题答案:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • 参考答案:B
  • 系统解析:
    根据题干中的Asimov's robots定位到文章第二段第一句。事实细节题。定位句指出,阿西莫夫设计的机器人应遵守的第一条法则就是机器人不能伤害人类或允许人类受到伤害,可见其被植入的程序是不可伤害人类,故答案为B。
4
What does the author want to say by mentioning the word "harm" in Asimov's laws?
A.Abstract concepts are hard to program.
B.It is hard for robots to make decisions.
C.Robots may do harm in certain situations.
D.Asimov's laws use too many vague terms.
本题答案:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • 参考答案:A
  • 系统解析:
    由题干中的the word “harm”定位到文章第四段第二至三句。推理判断题。从定位句可以看出,作者之所以提到“harm”一词,是想以此为例说明阿西莫夫法则存在的问题,该段第二句提到类似“伤害”这样的字眼太过模糊,接着提到抽象概念凸显了代码问题,再结合最后一句所述可知,如此抽象模糊的概念在实际的机器人程序设置中很难得到应用和体现,故答案为A。
5
What has the roboticist at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory found in his experiment?
A.Robots can be made as intelligent as human beings some day.
B.Robots can have moral issues encoded into their programs.
C.Robots can have trouble making decisions in complex scenarios.
D.Robots can be programmed to perceive potential perils.
本题答案:
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • 参考答案:C
  • 系统解析:
    由题干中的Bristol Robotics Laboratory和found定位到文章最后一段第六句。事实细节题。定位句提到,当两个人机者受到威胁时,机器人42%的时间会卡壳,无法决定应该救哪一个,从而导致它们都“死”了。可见,机器人在遇到复杂情况时难以做出决定,故答案为C。
我的笔记
提交纠错
请输入您发现的错误详情用户: