手机APP下载

您现在的位置: 首页 > 在线广播 > 科学美国人 > 科学美国人科学系列 > 正文

科学美国人60秒:推特揭示与新冠肺炎有关的政治问题

来源:可可英语 编辑:aimee   可可英语APP下载 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet
  


扫描二维码可进行跟读训练
  下载MP3到电脑  [F8键暂停/播放]   批量下载MP3到手机
&m9q|6qGqB^gFI

f~Z.~7zlyANCy

This is Scientific American's 60-second Science, I'm Christopher Intagliata.
The night of September 11th, President George W. Bush addressed the nation.
(CLIP: "Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America.")
The next day, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, a Democrat, said Congress stood united behind the president in condemning the attacks.
(CLIP: "The world should know the members of both parties, in both houses, stand united in this.")
"There was a lot of interparty unity right after 9·11. The messages the public was receiving were not politicized. There was a moment in which that could have happened around COVID. And to my surprise, it didn't."
Skyler Cranmer is a political scientist at the Ohio State University. His team analyzed tens of thousands of tweets sent out by members of Congress. The idea being to determine how and when COVID-19 became a politically divided issue.

PoG]obYP+xiC.;errt

白宫.jpg
Cranmer says the split happened quickly. From mid-January to the end of March, Democrats sent nearly twice as many tweets about COVID-19 as did Republicans. And the two parties spoke about the virus differently. Democrats frequently used the words "health," "testing" and "leave," as in sick leave. Republicans tended to favor words like "together" and "business."
The findings are in the journal Science Advances.
Cranmer says this division among political elites has serious consequences: it fractures the response of everyday Americans to the threat. If instead both parties had been united, he says...
"The cues that would be sent to individuals would have led to more consistent behavior changes among the public—and probably slow the spread of disease and probably save lives."
As Anthony Fauci said on a June 25 Facebook Live event with the Sacramento Press Club and CapRadio...
(CLIP: "It should not be a political issue. It is purely a public health issue. Forget the politics. Look at the data.")
Thanks for listening for Scientific American's 60-second Science. I'm Christopher Intagliata.

7t(d@0LjW5S

T|.Klbo[5W9HW7V

.P&r!TMJLZVrx5bDx1Qg0i3kwXn#!ynfy-v

重点单词   查看全部解释    
response [ri'spɔns]

想一想再看

n. 回答,响应,反应,答复
n. [宗

联想记忆
determine [di'tə:min]

想一想再看

v. 决定,决心,确定,测定

联想记忆
foundation [faun'deiʃən]

想一想再看

n. 基础,根据,建立
n. 粉底霜,基

联想记忆
spoke [spəuk]

想一想再看

v. 说,说话,演说

 
tend [tend]

想一想再看

v. 趋向,易于,照料,护理

 
split [split]

想一想再看

n. 劈开,裂片,裂口
adj. 分散的

 
threat [θret]

想一想再看

n. 威胁,凶兆
vt. 威胁, 恐吓

 
issue ['iʃju:]

想一想再看

n. 发行物,期刊号,争论点
vi. & vt

 
consistent [kən'sistənt]

想一想再看

adj. 始终如一的,一致的,坚持的

联想记忆
spread [spred]

想一想再看

v. 伸展,展开,传播,散布,铺开,涂撒
n.

 

发布评论我来说2句

    最新文章

    可可英语官方微信(微信号:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英语学习资料.

    添加方式1.扫描上方可可官方微信二维码。
    添加方式2.搜索微信号ikekenet添加即可。